| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
AlleyOop007 |
My Nominees for the 2009 Darwin Award . . . |
Lead | |
|
|
|||
jeeper1 |
|||
|
They get my vote.
I may not be completely sane, but at least I don't
think I have the power to influence the weather
grog101.forumco.com/active.asp www.GBOCannons.com www.homegunsmith.com/cgi-bin/ib3/ikonboard.cgi |
|||
TexasEd62 |
|||
|
Is there anymore details? Did the fumes get 'em or did they drown? And where did it happen?
TexasEd |
|||
AlleyOop007 |
|||
TexasEd62 wrote:Hi Ed, All the details are in the article. Just click on the link and you should get the full story.
|
|||
Thor96 |
|||
|
Ector County is Odessa. I know that area well where it happened. I can assure you the only time there is standing rain in that area is after a downpour rain.
There are a few dry lakebeds in the area which are dry 90% of the time. They must have been drunk.
On second thought, this may be like the case of the guy who was discovered with 20 feet of logging chain wrapped around him. Explanation in paper, "man drowns trying to swim river with stolen chain". On further thought, I do notice a number of problems with the article. 1. I don't think it is possible for exhaust fumes to vent back into the cab in this scenario. Water was deep enough to drown out electrical and intake system. 2. There were 5 victims... in a pickup truck? Was this an extended cab or crew cab? 3. "15 to 30 minutes may have passed before anyone realized the truck's occupants needed help". There were others present in the area witnessing this? Maybe, just maybe, Nah, I'm speculating now.
You may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, but an old dog can teach the pups a trick or two".
Thor
Last Edited By: Thor96
06/25/09 2:07 PM.
Edited 3 times.
|
|||
AlleyOop007 |
|||
Thor96 wrote:Thor, Here is more on the story from the Odessa paper: Odessa Paper AO007
Last Edited By: AlleyOop007
06/25/09 4:30 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
sully |
|||
|
When I was a kid growing up my whole family would go to town in the cab of the pick-up truck in the winter. There were 6 of us kids and both my partents---that
makes 8. Granted, 6 kids take up less space than adults, but thats a lot of cramming into a pick-up truck, no elbow room what-so-ever. But, we had good times.
"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so!"
Ronald Reagan |
|||
Thor96 |
|||
AlleyOop007 wrote:Thanks AO. I checked back to the original link and realized it was "LA Times". What more can you say for an article written from AP. Definately the Odessa American did a better job of reporting. For instance the $100 bet and presence of alcohol. They were probably all wiped out drunk and what's a little Carbon Monoxide to a drunk. Sully, I was trying to avoid any ethnic gesture, but... What can I say... yeah. 5 adult Latinos in a pickup truck. Extras usually ride in the back. I referenced the ethnicity as nicely as I know how, didn't I AO and Texas Ed? A drunk, er uh, Latino is worse than a Redneck at taking a sucker bet. I remember the first really bad accident I ever witnessed. A car load of, er uh, Latinos tried to pass, on a straightaway and level ground, but not enough space to complete the pass. It was a bloody mess.
You may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, but an old dog can teach the pups a trick or two".
Thor
Last Edited By: Thor96
06/25/09 7:39 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
dirty jim |
|||
|
i've done a ton of mudding & i could see that happening. depending on where his pipes ended & the condition of the floorboards of the truck it
could vent alot of exhaust into the cab very quickly. normally most of the exhaust would stay outside the truck but with the truck being in water deeper than
the floorboards or the bed of the truck it will collect under it untill it finds a place to excape. now say he had mufflers bolted to the back of a set of
headers with no tail pipes & holes in the floorboard the exhaust would fill the cab very quickly & if they had already been exposed to a bunch of
exhaust fumes carbon monoxide poisioning could have already started & the rush of exhaust into the cab could have put them all to sleep before they knew
what hit them
proud member of the Hillbilly Gunsmithing Guild
|
|||
pepperbelly |
|||
|
If the water was very deep I don't see how water could keep from killing the engine by coming through the intake.
I have launched a lot of boats. Just having the tailpipe under water doesn't blow exhaust into the cab- it just bubbles under the water. It doesn't create a lot of back pressure either. I would bet on a leaky exhaust venting carbon monoxide into the cab before it hit the water. Jim NRA Life Member Laws that forbid the carrying of arms... disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. --- Thomas Jefferson. |
|||
AlleyOop007 |
|||
Thor96 wrote:Hey, I've seen 5 or more adult Navajos in a standard cab pickup more than once during the winters I lived in Northern Arizona. I don't know what will happen to the Navajos if full sized pickups are phased out with the lefty environmentalists in control. Guess they will have to go back to wagons pulled by horses.
|
|||
Thor96 |
|||
|
AO, you may have missed a part of my post. I was trying to identify the people without reference to the Rio Grande.
I think Pepperbelly has a pretty good insight into the matter. I'm in question that the fumes would back pressure into the cab unless the exhaust system was in ill repair and also the floorboard. We're talking Texas, not Missouri. They don't use salt on their roads, so most floorboards are healthy, and cabs are protected pretty good from fumes. I'm also still wondering why the motor wasn't drowned out.
You may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, but an old dog can teach the pups a trick or two".
Thor
|
|||
AlleyOop007 |
|||
Thor96 wrote:Thor, I didn't miss that part of your post. I knew the ethnicity of the victims from the initial news release. My post about the Navajos was just to indicate that other groups are known to stretch the capacity of a pickup on occasion. As for the pickup, I guess we need know more about it. I can visualize a pickup with lifts that would get the engine high enough to keep the engine from submerging but leaving the tailpipes low enough to be under water - I see them pretty often in West Texas and Eastern New Mexico. If there are leaks in the exhaust system between the headers and tailpipes, the fumes could easily find their way into the cab through the floor or firewall (a "ranch truck" of any appreciable age is certainly susceptible to loosing the seals around wiring and other penetrations through those areas). I assume that the a/c was on since all the windows were rolled up. If that's the case, they were either re-circulating the air inside the pickup or if the a/c was set to bring in outside air they may have been bringing in the contaminated air (I don't know where Ford's a/c units access outside air when the a/c is set on "vent" but the source may be from in front of the windshield where the contaminated air rising from under the hood would be sucked into the cab.) What I can't understand is why the occupants didn't open the doors (if they couldn't open the windows) when the fumes started pouring into the cab; after all, the witness said the fumes were thick when they broke the window. The occupants must have smelled the exhaust fumes before they became overcome.
Last Edited By: AlleyOop007
06/26/09 12:22 PM.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
sully |
|||
|
Alley, Ford does bring the air in at the cowl panel, just under the passenger side windshield wiper. So, yes, this could account for sucking in bad air in the
event of an exhaust leak or a "bubble". But, the simple fact of the matter is that the vehicle is not to blame for this. It is the utter stupidity of
the victims involved. If they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol, it is very likely they couldn't process that they were being overcome by
exhaust fumes.
"Well, the trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't so!"
Ronald Reagan |
|||
AlleyOop007 |
|||
sully wrote:I take that to be another vote for my nomination of these poor unfortunates for the 2009 Darwin Awards.
|
|||
Thor96 |
|||
AlleyOop007 wrote:Yeah, you are right, we have no choice classify them candidates for the Darwin Award. IMO, anybody who drives while intoxicated and takes dumb bets is a candidate. Oops? Have ever done that? Yeah, guess I'm lucky to be alive. And I was a candidate back in those days for a lot of dumb stunts. Hey Alley, back on that cab capacity. Remember the 46 Ford truck? I had one. Cab was narrower than a Toyota pickup. Me and a buddy double dated a couple of fat gals one night, all squooshed in. One of the girls (mine) weighed 250-300 and the other one was 200-225. I weighed 145 and Leroy weighed maybe 135. We were the little guys. Leroy ended up marrying the little one and his brother ended up marrying the big one. I just remembered their names but will keep them in confidence to protect the innocent. Me and Leroy? We weren't innocent of anything.
You may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, but an old dog can teach the pups a trick or two".
Thor
|
|||
AlleyOop007 |
|||
Thor96 wrote:You and Leroy must have been sitting in those girls laps since I cannot visualize it any other way that would allow you two "shrimps" to survive.
|
|||
Thor96 |
|||
|
Leroy was sitting in his girl's lap, I was pressed hard against the door, driving with one hand, right arm around Joyce, she straddled the gearshift
(floorshift)and shifted, don't remember whose foot was on the gas, I think hers, but I had control of clutch and brake.
You may not be able to teach an old dog new tricks, but an old dog can teach the pups a trick or two".
Thor
|
|||