<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>my 1934 K31 (pic heavy) </title>
        <link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/topic/17503/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Hello all,


I just recieved my first walnut K31, and first for a troop tag! 523276 - If my figures are right, it should have been made about Feb of 1934. The 3266th rifle
made!! (or at least what I&#39;d like to imagine!!)  The troop tag puzzles me somewhat, maybe someone could help me with it.  It shoots alot better than my
1948, with a much nicer trigger pull (from wear I&#39;d think).  There is hardly any bluing left on the reciever or end of the bbl, and the beaver has been to
the stock,... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:06:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/89065/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-89065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sure is a treasure elginrunner, most likely did serve with two different soldiers. I&#39;ll bet some great moments was had with both. Thats a great looking
stack also.<img height="15" src="http://www.ezboard.com/images/emoticons/happy.gif" width="15" alt="image">

<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LoLo25643)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/89065</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/88959/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-88959</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ That does sound reasonable. The action&#39;s bluing is worn enough to have seen two periods of service. It has a arsenal stamp of 57. I was baffled by the
inconsistant inspecters stamp on the bbl, untill I learned what the 57 was. I&#39;m guessing it got a new bbl then. I just took it apart and gave it a good
cleaning tonight. The stock and bands all match the serial. One thing that I did notice, was that the bolt serial is stamped very deep, like on my 48&#39;. The
side of the reciever on... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (elginrunner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/88959</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:54:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/88958/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-88958</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What if the first owner turned it in at the end of his military career instead of keeping it, they don&#39;t throw away the rifle then but use it again for a
new recruit.
<br>
<br>
That tag is a puzzle, I can&#39;t make anything out of that last name and that address (or maybe a hotel or pension&#39;s name) is unknown either, what I can
make of it is Kurt, the place Murten and the first company of the 17th battalion of mountain fusileers based in Freiburg which is close to Murten.
<br>
<br>... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Guisan)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/88958</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/88955/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-88955</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Doesn&#39;t seem a bit odd that a 1934 rifle would be issued to someone who was born in 1936? Wouldn&#39;t that put his service about 1954.... that&#39;s what
confused the heck out of me.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (elginrunner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/88955</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 01:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/88954/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-88954</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">elginrunner wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Hello all,
  <br>
  <br>
  I just recieved my first walnut K31, and first for a troop tag! 523276 - If my figures are right, it should have been made about Feb of 1934. The 3266th
  rifle made!! (or at least what I&#39;d like to imagine!!) The troop tag puzzles me somewhat, maybe someone could help me with it. It shoots alot better than
  my 1948, with a much nicer trigger pull (from wear I&#39;d think). There is... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (wkato)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/88954</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:32:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/88941/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-88941</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Nice carbine , congrats!. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (jd46561)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/88941</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:17:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/reply/88938/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html#reply-88938</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Great picture, thank you for sharing.
<br>
<br>
I&#39;m hoping Guisan will wander on by and clear things up as far as the Troop Tag. (It seems to be effortless for him) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Hawkster318)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/sreply/88938</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:43:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ my 1934 K31 (pic heavy)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/topic/17503/t/my-1934-K31-pic-heavy-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hello all,
<br>
<br>
I just recieved my first walnut K31, and first for a troop tag! 523276 - If my figures are right, it should have been made about Feb of 1934. The 3266th rifle
made!! (or at least what I&#39;d like to imagine!!)  The troop tag puzzles me somewhat, maybe someone could help me with it.  It shoots alot better than my
1948, with a much nicer trigger pull (from wear I&#39;d think).  There is hardly any bluing left on the reciever or end of the bbl, and the beaver has been to... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (elginrunner)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://curioandrelicfirearmsforum.yuku.com/topic/17503</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 01:51:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>